about an equal outburst of groans and laughter after this statement at the talk.) When I quote references from the years before the present, I use the language of those times and [ do not correct statements to the gender-neutral language of. Thus, I can assure you that all the elements were close to my heart. While delivering the oral version of this paper, I wore a tie that incorporated the periodic table o f elements to celebrate the event. I remain less than fully satisfied with the completeness of this paper and have yielded reluctantly to personal limits of scholarship and the requirement to submit the paper in written form by a deadline.įor the readers who are expecting a mention of their favorite element, I regret that limited space precludes a full exploration of the oceans using the periodic table of elements as a guide, although in my opinion that. Their papers, lectures, seminars, and informal conversations inform this paper. In hindsight, the lack of a more systematic survey may have been a mistake, but I have had the good fortune in my career to have met and listened to many of the chemical oceanographers and marine chemists in the United States and elsewhere. I sought advice on this paper from several colleagues, but I did not conduct a systematic survey by questionnaire. Those who view the videotape of the presentation and compare it with this written version will note a few significant additions. I have continued to revise the paper after initial oral presentation. Admittedly important areas of research-marine biochemistry, natural product chemistry, and contributions of marine isotopic chemistry to paleoclimate and paleoceanographic studies-that could be thought of by many as marine geochemistry or marine chemistry are not included because of space and time limitations and because they seemed to be beyond the charge given to me. The space allocated for this paper is limited, and there is an abundance of significant contributions by individuals and groups deserving of explicit recognition-more than can be incorporated into this paper. The committee must also have learned how excited and enthusiastic I am about the study of the oceans and about scientific research and education in general. I suspect that I am the substitute because someone on the organizing committee obtained a copy of my undergraduate transcript and learned that my grades in history and political science were reasonable and certainly much better on the average than my grades in the sciences and math. For various reasons, those more qualified were not available to write this paper. Given the credentials and landmark (should we call them "seamark" or "channel buoy?") contributions of the others, it is clear that I am a substitute for those much more qualified to satisfy the charge of the committee. I am honored to have the opportunity to share my views on this topic of achievements in chemical oceanography since the 1950s. The charge given to me by the steering committee is as follows: focus on landmark achievements in chemical oceanography over the past 50 years, the individuals involved, the new technology and ideas that made these achievements possible, how one discovery built on the foundations of earlier ones, discoveries made at the intersections of disciplines, and the role that NSF programs and institutional arrangements had in making these achievements possible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |